Can Inflammation Cause Anxiety?

Author: Lori Calabrese, MD

Quick Answer

Yes. Inflammation can contribute to anxiety in some people, but not because inflammation simply creates anxious thoughts.

The brain is continuously interpreting two environments at the same time: the world around us and the biological conditions within us. Immune activity, metabolism, hormones, sleep, nutrition, pain, infection, stress, and countless other signals help establish the biological environment in which the brain is operating. When inflammation communicates that those conditions have changed, the brain may respond by increasing vigilance, reallocating energy, altering sleep, changing motivation, and becoming more sensitive to uncertainty or potential threat. In some individuals, those adaptive changes may be experienced as anxiety.

Inflammation is only one factor capable of influencing this process. Anxiety is a complex human experience shaped by the continuous interaction of biology, psychology, relationships, life experiences, and the environment. Not everyone with inflammation develops anxiety, and not everyone with anxiety has significant inflammation. Human biology is far more complex than any single explanation.

Understanding this relationship does not replace psychological or psychiatric care. Instead, it expands our understanding of why anxiety develops and why recovery sometimes requires more than treating symptoms alone. Lasting improvement may depend upon restoring the biological conditions from which healthier brain function can naturally emerge.

Key Takeaways

• Inflammation can contribute to anxiety, but it does not do so by simply creating anxious thoughts. It changes the biological environment within which the brain is operating, influencing how the brain interprets the world and allocates its resources.
• The brain never functions in isolation. It continuously integrates information from the immune system, metabolism, hormones, sleep, nutrition, the autonomic nervous system, the gut, and the external environment before determining how to respond.
• Inflammation is information. Beyond helping protect the body from infection or injury, inflammatory signaling communicates that biological conditions have changed and that the brain may need to adjust its priorities.
• Anxiety may sometimes represent an adaptive response rather than a primary malfunction. Under certain biological conditions, increased vigilance, heightened awareness of uncertainty, and greater sensitivity to potential threat may reflect the brain’s attempt to protect the organism.
• Protective responses are designed to resolve. Many symptoms become persistent not simply because protection was activated, but because the biological conditions that support restoration and recovery have not yet been fully re-established.
• Not everyone responds to inflammation in the same way. Genetics, age, metabolic health, sleep, hormones, nutrition, previous illness, medications, and overall biological reserve all influence how the brain responds to changing biological conditions.
• Anxiety rarely exists in isolation. When anxiety develops alongside fatigue, disrupted sleep, brain fog, chronic pain, metabolic dysfunction, hormonal changes, digestive symptoms, or other unexplained physical symptoms, those experiences may reflect a broader biological pattern rather than unrelated conditions.
• Understanding biology does not replace psychology. Human experience emerges from the continuous interaction of biological, psychological, social, developmental, and environmental influences. Systems biology complements these perspectives by helping explain how they become embodied.
• Lasting recovery often requires more than reducing symptoms. It may require restoring the biological conditions from which healthier brain function naturally emerges.

When the World Feels Different

Anxiety does not always begin with an anxious thought.

Sometimes it begins with a subtle realization that something has changed.

Many people struggle to describe it. They simply know they don’t feel quite like themselves anymore. Things that once felt manageable require more effort. Ordinary decisions become more difficult. Small problems seem larger than they used to. It becomes harder to relax, harder to concentrate, harder to recover, or harder to feel like the person they remember being.

Often there is no single dramatic event. Instead, people describe a growing sense that something is different.

“I just don’t feel like myself.”

“Nothing around me has changed, but I have.”

“I used to handle stress much better.”

“Something feels wrong, and I can’t explain it.”

The natural response is to search for a psychological explanation. What am I worried about? Why am I reacting this way? Have I become less resilient? Am I developing an anxiety disorder? Those are reasonable questions. Anxiety is experienced through thoughts, emotions, bodily sensations, expectations, and behavior. Life circumstances, relationships, trauma, uncertainty, and learned patterns can all shape it.

But the brain does not interpret the external world in isolation.

It is continuously receiving information from within the body as well.

Immune activity, hormones, sleep, metabolism, energy availability, pain, temperature, autonomic tone, medications, infections, environmental exposures, and countless other signals help establish the conditions under which the brain is functioning at any given moment. Social connection, loneliness, conflict, safety, uncertainty, meaning, and purpose also become part of that context because they alter physiology as well as experience.

The brain does not encounter these as separate medical specialties—it encounters one changing environment.

This may be one reason a person can wake up in the same home, beside the same spouse, facing the same job and responsibilities, yet experience the world very differently from the day before. The external circumstances may be nearly identical. The biological context is not.

A night of fragmented sleep may have changed autonomic tone and inflammatory signaling. An infection may be developing before obvious symptoms appear. Hormonal conditions may be shifting. Blood glucose may be less stable. Pain may be demanding attention. A medication may be exerting a different effect. Chronic stress may have reduced the capacity to absorb one more demand. Environmental exposures, alcohol, poor nutrition, illness, or accumulated sleep loss may be adding weight to signals that previously carried very little.

Same person.

Same world.

Different conditions.

Different experience.

This is where the usual question—What am I anxious about?—may become too narrow, and where a second question deserves equal attention:

Under what biological conditions is my brain interpreting the world right now?

That question does not make anxiety less real. It does not replace psychology with biology. It recognizes that psychological experience is one of the ways biology becomes conscious.

The brain is constantly interpreting context. It evaluates what deserves attention, what may represent danger, how much uncertainty can be tolerated, whether energy should be conserved, whether the body should prepare for action, and how much capacity remains available for concentration, emotional regulation, social engagement, recovery, and sleep.

Much of this occurs before conscious thought.

The organism cannot wait for certainty before responding. It must often act on estimates. A possible threat may acquire priority before a person can identify what feels threatening. The body may become tense before the mind has formed a story. Attention may narrow before a person recognizes that they are becoming hypervigilant. Ordinary demands may begin to feel overwhelming before anyone understands why available capacity has changed.

Inflammation is one of the biological conditions capable of influencing this process.

It is not merely a laboratory finding, nor is it simply damage occurring somewhere in the body. Inflammatory activity communicates information. It tells the nervous system that conditions have changed and that certain biological priorities need to change with them.

That information can influence vigilance, arousal, sleep, motivation, attention, bodily sensation, social behavior, and the interpretation of uncertainty. Anxiety may emerge as one expression of that shift.

Sometimes the world has become more dangerous. Sometimes it hasn’t.  

What has changed is that the brain has become more prepared to detect danger.

Inflammation is only one piece of the story.

But once we understand how the brain responds to changing biological conditions, anxiety begins to make sense in an entirely different way.

Perhaps something changed around your brain before it changed within your mind.

Your Brain Never Works in Isolation

One of the most common assumptions about the brain is that it works primarily by responding to what is happening around us. We experience a stressful event, and we become anxious. We receive good news, and our mood improves. Something frightening happens, and our heart begins to race. There is obvious truth in that way of thinking because the world around us profoundly influences how we think and feel.

But it is also incomplete.

The brain is not simply observing the outside world. It is continuously monitoring the condition of the body as well, because every decision it makes depends upon the biological environment in which it is operating.

It could not function any other way.

Imagine trying to run an intensive care unit without knowing which patients were critically ill, which medications were running low, or whether the oxygen supply had suddenly failed. Every important decision would be made without the information needed to make it safely.

The brain faces a similar challenge. Before it can decide where to direct your attention, how much energy to expend, or whether it is safe to relax, it first has to know the condition of the body it is responsible for managing.

Is energy readily available, or are resources becoming limited? Is an infection developing? Has inflammation increased? Has sleep restored yesterday’s demands, or is the brain beginning the day already at a disadvantage? Are hormones changing? Is pain demanding attention? Is blood glucose stable? Has the body been under prolonged stress?

None of these questions enter conscious awareness, yet the answers shape virtually everything the brain does. They influence whether the brain is prepared to learn, solve problems, recover, build, connect socially, or instead redirect its resources toward protecting the organism under changing biological conditions.

This is one of the reasons symptoms rarely exist in isolation. Sleep affects inflammation. Inflammation affects metabolism. Metabolism influences hormones. Hormones influence immune function. Immune activity alters brain function.

The brain is not waiting for one system to finish before listening to the next. It is listening to all of them at once.

That is why biology often feels so complicated when we look at it through the lens of medical specialties. One physician talks about hormones. Another focuses on inflammation. Another discusses sleep. Another treats anxiety. Another addresses nutrition.

The body has no such divisions.

Those divisions belong to medicine, not to biology.

We separate health into cardiology, endocrinology, psychiatry, rheumatology, neurology, gastroenterology, and dozens of other specialties because no single physician can master every aspect of human biology. Specialization has advanced medicine in extraordinary ways.

The body, however, never received that memo.

Every cell continues to participate in one integrated biological conversation.

Inflammation influences hormones. Hormones influence metabolism. Metabolism influences immune function.

Sleep changes all of them.

The nervous system is listening continuously, not to one organ or one laboratory value, but to the integrated condition of the organism as a whole.

That perspective changes the way we think about symptoms.

Anxiety is not occurring in isolation from sleep, metabolism, immune function, pain, hormonal health, or nutrition.

It emerges from the same biological environment that is influencing all of those systems simultaneously.

By the time you consciously recognize that something has changed—that you’re not quite thinking, feeling, or functioning the way you normally do—the brain has often been responding to changing biological conditions for some time. Conscious awareness is frequently one of the last steps in the process rather than the first.

How Does the Body Tell the Brain That Conditions Have Changed?

If the brain is continuously interpreting the condition of the body, one of the most important questions that most of us never think to ask is:

How does it know when those conditions have changed?

The answer is not a single pathway or a single molecule. Human biology is far too sophisticated for that. Instead, the brain receives information through an intricate communication network that is constantly exchanging signals throughout the body. Long before we become consciously aware that “something feels different,” these systems have often been communicating for minutes, hours, or even days.

This should not be surprising. Modern medicine often teaches the nervous system, immune system, endocrine system, and metabolic system as though they operate independently. They are described in different textbooks, treated by different specialists, and measured with different laboratory tests.

Biology recognizes no such boundaries.

The immune system does not ask whether a signal belongs to psychiatry before communicating with the brain. Hormones do not wait for inflammation to finish before altering metabolism. The autonomic nervous system is not taking turns with the endocrine system. These conversations occur simultaneously because survival depends upon integration, not specialization.

An experienced physician sees this every day in clinical practice. Someone develops influenza, and within hours they become profoundly fatigued, lose their appetite, withdraw socially, sleep differently, and find it difficult to concentrate. Another person begins treatment with high-dose corticosteroids and notices that their mood, energy, sleep, and anxiety change within days. A woman entering menopause may first recognize changes in sleep, concentration, emotional resilience, or anxiety before she understands that hormonal physiology is shifting. The diagnosis may differ, but the pattern is remarkably familiar: when biology changes, the brain often changes with it.

This is not evidence that the brain is malfunctioning.

It is evidence that the brain is listening.

One of the most important ways it listens is through the immune system. When immune cells recognize infection, injury, or other biological challenges, they release signaling molecules that help coordinate the body’s response. These chemical messengers are not simply local instructions telling one tissue what to do next. They also become part of the ongoing conversation informing the brain about the condition of the organism.

The brain does not interpret those signals in isolation. It integrates them with everything else it already knows: how much energy is available, whether sleep has been restorative, whether stress has been prolonged, whether hormones are changing, whether pain is present, and whether resources should be directed toward growth, reproduction, learning, recovery, or protection.

That integration is one of the brain’s greatest achievements. It allows us to adapt continuously to changing biological conditions rather than responding to every signal as though it existed alone.

Inflammation becomes important because it is one of the body’s most powerful ways of communicating that conditions have changed. It is not merely swelling, redness, or an elevated laboratory marker. It is information.

And once we begin thinking of inflammation as information rather than simply inflammation as damage, a great deal about anxiety starts to make sense.

How Do Inflammatory Signals Reach the Brain?

One of the most important questions in human biology is one that most of us never think to ask.

If inflammation is often occurring in a sore throat, an injured knee, the digestive tract, or somewhere else in the body, how does the brain know about it?

After all, the brain is protected from much of the body’s circulation by the blood-brain barrier, a highly specialized network of cells that serves as far more than a passive wall. It acts as a dynamic biological interface, selectively transporting nutrients into the brain, actively exporting waste products and potentially harmful substances, continuously sensing changes in the body’s internal environment, and regulating which signals are allowed to influence the brain. Rather than separating the brain from the body, it functions as one of the body’s most sophisticated biological gatekeepers.

At first glance, this seems like a contradiction.

If the brain is protected from the rest of the body, how can it possibly remain informed about changes occurring throughout the body?

The answer reveals something remarkable about human biology.

The brain is not isolated from the body.

It is selectively connected to it.

Just as an intensive care physician does not need to stand beside every patient to know when someone’s condition is changing, the brain does not need to be directly exposed to every site of inflammation. What it requires is reliable communication that allows it to recognize when conditions have changed and determine whether those changes require a coordinated response.

Biology has evolved multiple ways to accomplish exactly that.

Some inflammatory signaling molecules communicate through specialized regions where the blood-brain barrier is naturally more permissive, allowing the brain to monitor important changes in the body’s internal environment. Other signals are detected by sensory nerves, including the vagus nerve, which continuously carries information from organs throughout the body back to the brain. Inflammatory signals can also influence the cells that form the blood-brain barrier itself, prompting those cells to relay information into the brain without allowing the inflammatory molecules themselves to cross freely. Together, these pathways allow the brain to remain continuously informed while preserving the protection that the blood-brain barrier provides.

This elegant design reflects an important biological principle.

The challenge is not simply receiving information. The challenge is making sense of it.

Every moment, the brain is receiving an extraordinary volume of biological information. Immune signaling molecules, hormonal fluctuations, nutrients, glucose, ketones, oxygen availability, sensory nerve activity, circadian signals, metabolic byproducts, and countless other messages are arriving simultaneously. The brain’s task is not merely to detect these signals, but to determine which ones matter most, how they relate to one another, and whether together they represent a significant change in the body’s condition.

From that interpretation come an endless series of biological decisions.

Should energy continue to support growth and reproduction?

Should more resources be diverted toward immune defense?

Should physical activity decrease while recovery increases?

Should attention become more focused on potential threats?

These are not separate decisions made by separate systems. They are coordinated adjustments emerging from one integrated biological conversation—a conversation that never stops.

Seen in that light, inflammation is much more than an iimmune response.

It is information.

Information that helps the brain understand the body’s changing biological environment, reassess priorities, and coordinate an adaptive response.

That perspective changes the way we think about inflammation.

Its purpose is not simply to produce redness, swelling, fever, or pain. Those may be visible manifestations of inflammation, but they are not its only purpose. Inflammation also communicates. It tells the brain that biological conditions have changed and that the body’s priorities may need to change with them.

Once we recognize inflammation as a source of biological information rather than simply a source of damage, another question naturally follows.

Why would receiving that information change the way we think, feel, and behave?

Why Would Inflammation Make Someone Feel More Anxious?

If inflammation is information, then one of the most important questions in human biology becomes remarkably simple.

What is the brain supposed to do with it?

The answer reveals something fundamental about how the brain works.

The brain does not simply collect biological information. Every moment, outside of conscious awareness, it is continuously integrating thousands of signals arriving from throughout the body, determining which deserve priority, how they relate to one another, and whether together they represent a meaningful change in the body’s biological condition.

Only then does the brain begin coordinating the countless physiological and behavioral adjustments that follow from its interpretation of the body’s current biological condition.

Seen from that perspective, anxiety begins to look different.

Rather than asking whether inflammation simply causes anxiety, we can ask a more biologically meaningful question.

What if anxiety sometimes reflects the brain’s interpretation that biological conditions have changed and that the body’s priorities should change with them?

Most of the time, those goals overlap. When the body is healthy, well-rested, adequately nourished, and living in a relatively safe environment, the brain can devote more of its resources to learning, creativity, relationships, long-term planning, and the countless activities that allow us to flourish.

But biology is built to recognize that conditions can change.

An infection may be developing. An injury may require repair. Energy may become limited. Resources may need to be redirected. Under those circumstances, continuing to behave as though nothing has changed would be a remarkably poor survival strategy.

Instead, the brain begins asking a different set of questions.

Is this the right time to explore, or the right time to become more cautious?

Should attention remain broadly distributed, or should it become more focused on potential threats?

Is conserving energy now more important than pursuing long-term goals?

Have biological conditions changed enough that the body’s priorities should change as well?

Notice that these are not psychological questions.

They are biological questions.

And the answers do not require conscious thought. They emerge from the brain’s continuous interpretation of information arriving from throughout the body.

From that perspective, anxiety begins to look different.

Rather than asking why inflammation causes anxiety, we might first ask whether heightened vigilance could sometimes represent an adaptive response to changing biological conditions.

That does not mean every episode of anxiety is protective. Nor does it mean inflammation explains every anxiety disorder. Human behavior is far too complex for such sweeping conclusions.

It does suggest, however, that under some circumstances, becoming more vigilant, more alert, more cautious, and more attentive to potential danger may represent exactly the kind of response we would expect from a brain that has concluded conditions have changed.

That possibility shifts the conversation in an important way.

Instead of viewing anxiety as something the brain is doing to us, we can begin asking whether, at least in some situations, it may represent something the brain is attempting to do for us.

Changing Biological Priorities

If the brain concludes that biological conditions have changed, it cannot simply register that information and continue functioning exactly as before. Biological information matters because it helps determine what should happen next.

A physician caring for someone in an intensive care unit understands this immediately. When blood pressure begins to fall, oxygen levels decline, or laboratory findings reveal that an organ is under stress, the new information does not become one more fact in the medical record. It changes the priorities of the entire team. Attention narrows. Resources are redirected. Treatments that seemed appropriate an hour earlier may no longer be appropriate now. The patient’s changing condition alters what matters most.

The brain faces a similar challenge, although most of its adjustments occur outside conscious awareness. When the information arriving from throughout the body suggests that biological conditions have changed, the brain begins reorganizing attention, physiology, behavior, and the use of available resources in ways that better fit its interpretation of those conditions.

Under favorable conditions, resources can be devoted more generously to exploration, learning, creativity, social connection, reproduction, physical performance, and long-term planning. These are biologically expensive activities. They depend upon adequate energy, sufficient reserve, and a reasonable expectation that the body’s immediate needs are being met.

Inflammation changes that calculation. If an infection is developing, tissue requires repair, energy availability is becoming less certain, or the body is responding to prolonged biological stress, continuing to allocate resources exactly as before no longer makes biological sense. Greater caution is needed. Attention becomes more sensitive to possible threat. Activity decreases as recovery assumes greater importance. And energy that might otherwise support exploration, growth, performance, or reproduction is redirected toward immune activity, repair, and the restoration of physiologic stability.

What the person notices may seem far removed from inflammation itself. Ordinary demands feel harder to manage. Concentration becomes less reliable. Mental stamina declines. Sleep changes. Pain becomes more intrusive. Motivation recedes. The world may feel less manageable, and the person may become more vigilant, irritable, uneasy, or anxious without understanding why.

Medicine often separates these experiences into individual symptoms because that is how clinical care is organized. Biology may be doing something far more integrated. Anxiety, fatigue, reduced motivation, altered sleep, cognitive difficulty, and increased sensitivity to stress may sometimes represent different expressions of the same underlying shift in biological priorities.

This does not mean that every symptom is adaptive, that every episode of anxiety is caused by inflammation, or that a response that began for a useful reason will necessarily remain useful. A biological adjustment may be appropriate during an acute infection and deeply disruptive if it persists for months. The same vigilance that helps someone respond to immediate danger can become exhausting when the brain continues to behave as though danger remains. The same redirection of energy that supports short-term recovery can begin to impair function when normal allocation is never restored.

That distinction is essential. Inflammation does not influence only one emotion or one neurotransmitter. It can contribute to a broader reorganization of biological priorities. The symptoms we eventually recognize may be the conscious expression of changes that began much earlier, as the brain responded to information from the body and adjusted the way resources were being used.

Only now can we ask what those adjustments look like inside the brain—and how inflammatory signaling begins changing the neural systems involved in vigilance, mood, motivation, cognition, and anxiety.

What the person notices may seem far removed from inflammation itself. Ordinary demands feel harder to manage. Concentration becomes less reliable. Mental stamina declines. Sleep changes. Pain becomes more intrusive. Motivation recedes. The world may feel less manageable, and the person may become more vigilant, irritable, uneasy, or anxious without understanding why.

Medicine often separates these experiences into individual symptoms because that is how clinical care is organized. Biology may be doing something far more integrated. Anxiety, fatigue, reduced motivation, altered sleep, cognitive difficulty, and increased sensitivity to stress may represent different expressions of the same underlying shift in biological priorities.

This does not mean that every symptom is adaptive, that every episode of anxiety is caused by inflammation, or that a response that began for a useful reason will necessarily remain useful. A biological adjustment may be appropriate during an acute infection and deeply disruptive if it persists for months. The same vigilance that helps someone respond to immediate danger can become exhausting when the brain continues to behave as though danger remains. The same redirection of energy that supports short-term recovery can begin to impair function when normal allocation is never restored.

That distinction is essential. Inflammation does not influence only one emotion or one neurotransmitter. It can contribute to a broader reorganization of biological priorities. The symptoms we eventually recognize may be the conscious expression of changes that began much earlier, as the brain responded to information from the body and adjusted the way resources were being used.

Only now can we ask what those adjustments look like inside the brain—and how inflammatory signaling begins changing the neural systems involved in vigilance, mood, motivation, cognition, and anxiety.

How Does the Brain Put Those New Priorities Into Action?

Recognizing that biological priorities have changed is only the beginning.

The brain must then translate that interpretation into action.

That requires changing the activity of billions of neurons communicating through extraordinarily complex networks. Attention shifts. Motivation changes. Sleep becomes different. Pain may feel more intense. Memory, concentration, appetite, movement, vigilance, and emotional responsiveness can all be adjusted as the brain reorganizes its activity to fit what it believes the body now needs.

This is where inflammatory signaling begins to exert many of its effects.

The signaling molecules released during inflammation—including cytokines such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interferons, chemokines, prostaglandins, and many others—do far more than coordinate immune cells. Through multiple communication pathways, they influence neurons, microglia, astrocytes, endothelial cells, the blood-brain barrier, autonomic pathways, and the intricate neural networks that allow different regions of the brain to function as an integrated whole.

As these signals are interpreted, the brain begins altering many of the systems responsible for implementing its priorities. Neurotransmitter systems—including serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, glutamate, GABA, acetylcholine, and the kynurenine pathway—may all be affected. Stress physiology involving the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis changes. Energy metabolism shifts. Neuroplasticity is modified through factors such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Even the way neurons communicate with one another can change.

The result is not the activation of a single “anxiety pathway.”

The brain has no such pathway.

Instead, inflammation influences multiple interconnected networks that together shape attention, emotional regulation, motivation, learning, memory, threat detection, sleep, appetite, pain perception, and the allocation of mental and physical energy.

That distinction is important.

These changes are not occurring in a static organ. The brain is continuously remodeling itself in response to the biological information it receives. Synaptic connections strengthen or weaken, neural networks reorganize, and patterns of communication evolve as the brain adapts to changing internal and external conditions.

People often imagine that anxiety develops because one neurotransmitter rises, another falls, or one small part of the brain becomes overactive. One of the enduring misconceptions in neuroscience is that emotions can be explained by individual neurotransmitters. We often hear that serotonin is the “happiness chemical” or dopamine is the “reward chemical.” Reality is considerably more sophisticated. Neurotransmitters are part of the language through which the brain implements changing biological priorities. Their significance lies not in any single molecule, but in the coordinated way multiple signaling systems interact to reshape attention, motivation, vigilance, learning, memory, emotional regulation, and behavior.

This helps explain why people experiencing increased inflammation rarely notice only anxiety. They often describe fatigue, brain fog, reduced motivation, altered sleep, changes in appetite, heightened pain sensitivity, diminished cognitive stamina, and feeling “not like themselves.” Those experiences are frequently siloed and evaluated as separate problems by different specialists. But from the brain’s perspective, they represent different expressions of one coordinated biological adaptation.

What we eventually experience as anxiety, fatigue, poor concentration, altered sleep, or reduced motivation often represents the visible surface of a much deeper biological process. Long before those symptoms enter conscious awareness, the brain has already been interpreting information, reprioritizing resources, and reorganizing the activity of countless interconnected systems in an effort to adapt to changing biological conditions.

The question is no longer whether inflammation can influence the brain.

The question becomes how those adaptive changes sometimes persist long after they are no longer needed.

When Does the Brain Know It Is Safe Again?

Everything we have discussed so far depends upon one assumption.

It assumes that once the body has successfully responded to a changing biological condition, the adaptive response eventually comes to an end.

That may sound obvious, but it is one of the most remarkable achievements in human biology.

Starting a protective response is only half the task.

Knowing when to stop is equally important.

When inflammation helps protect us from infection or injury, the body’s goal is far more than to initiate an inflammatory response. It is to restore health. As the threat resolves, the body actively begins withdrawing the signals that promoted protection, reallocating resources, repairing tissues, restoring normal physiology, and gradually returning biological priorities toward their previous balance. Redness fades, tenderness resolves, pain recedes. Wherever in the body inflammation is located, a similar cascade of withdrawl and reallocation occurs.

Resolution is not what happens when inflammation simply fades away.

Resolution is biology at work.

It is an active, highly orchestrated process involving specialized immune cells, pro-resolving mediators, neural circuits, metabolic pathways, hormones, and countless molecular signals that together communicate a critically important message:

The emergency is over.

Only then can the brain safely begin reallocating attention, energy, physiology, and behavior toward exploration, learning, connection, performance, recovery, reproduction, and the many other activities that characterize health.

This is where one of the most important distinctions in medicine begins to emerge.

Many diseases and medical conditions are described by the presence of inflammation.

But far fewer discussions ask whether the inflammatory response has been allowed to resolve appropriately.

If the brain continues receiving information that suggests biological conditions remain unfavorable, it has little reason to restore yesterday’s priorities. From its perspective, remaining vigilant, conserving resources, and maintaining protective adaptations may still represent the safest course of action.

The result is not that the brain is malfunctioning.

It may be that the brain is continuing to interpret the biological information it is receiving in exactly the way evolution prepared it to do.

That possibility changes the conversation completely.

Instead of asking only, “Why am I anxious?” we can begin asking a different question:

Why does my brain still believe that heightened vigilance remains biologically appropriate?

How Inflammation Changes the Brain

It Changes Vigilance

One of the brain’s first responsibilities is deciding how carefully the world should be monitored.

That decision is never fixed. It changes continuously as the brain integrates information arriving from throughout the body and the external environment. Under favorable biological conditions, attention can be directed toward learning, creativity, relationships, work, exploration, and long-term planning. When biology suggests that conditions have become less favorable, those priorities begin to shift.

Inflammation is one of the signals capable of changing that calculation.

As inflammatory information reaches the brain, networks involved in detecting uncertainty and potential threat become more responsive. Brain regions that evaluate the emotional significance of incoming information, including structures such as the amygdala and the broader salience network, begin assigning greater importance to events that might otherwise have been dismissed as unimportant. At the same time, inflammatory signaling influences systems involving norepinephrine, the locus coeruleus, and other pathways that regulate alertness and vigilance.

From the outside, this may feel like anxiety.

From the brain’s perspective, it may represent an adaptive adjustment in how carefully the environment should be monitored under changing biological conditions.

The important point is not that inflammation creates fear.

It changes the threshold for deciding what deserves attention.

It Changes Energy Allocation

The human brain accounts for only a small percentage of total body weight, yet under ordinary circumstances it consumes roughly one-fifth of the body’s energy.

Energy is therefore one of the brain’s most carefully managed resources.

When inflammation signals that immune activity, tissue repair, or recovery have become higher priorities, the brain begins reallocating energy accordingly. Mitochondria adjust their activity. Glucose metabolism changes. In some situations, ketone availability and utilization becomes increasingly important. Entire physiological systems begin competing for resources that are always finite.

This helps explain why inflammation is so often accompanied by profound fatigue.

Fatigue is frequently misunderstood as a failure to generate enough energy.

In many situations, the problem is different.

The brain is changing where that energy is being invested.

When recovery becomes a higher biological priority than performance, the experience of fatigue may represent part of that adaptive reallocation rather than simply an absence of energy itself.

It Changes Motivation

Motivation is often described as a personality trait.

Biology suggests something very different.

From the brain’s perspective, motivation is one way of deciding which behaviors deserve investment at a particular moment.

That decision depends upon biological context.

When conditions support growth and opportunity, pursuing ambitious goals, solving difficult problems, seeking novelty, and investing effort make biological sense. When inflammation suggests that protection and recovery deserve greater priority, those same behaviors may temporarily become less advantageous.

Neural systems involving dopamine and interconnected reward networks begin recalibrating how much value is assigned to different activities. Effort feels more expensive. Rewards feel less compelling. Behaviors that once required little thought may suddenly require considerable determination.

This is one reason inflammation is frequently accompanied by reduced motivation.

The brain is not simply reducing motivation. It is recalibrating the biological priorities that shape motivation itself.

It Changes Learning and Memory

Learning requires the brain to assume that today’s experiences will remain useful tomorrow.

Inflammation changes that assumption.

The brain begins placing greater emphasis on immediate adaptation than on long-term learning. Regions involved in memory formation, including the hippocampus, become influenced by inflammatory signaling. Synaptic communication changes. Neuroplasticity is altered through pathways involving brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), glutamate, and many other molecular systems that determine how efficiently neurons strengthen, weaken, and reorganize their connections.

These changes may help explain why people experiencing significant inflammation often describe brain fog, forgetfulness, reduced concentration, slower thinking, and difficulty learning new information.

Those experiences are often interpreted as isolated cognitive symptoms.

From a biological perspective, they reflect the consequences of a brain that has temporarily reorganized itself for protection rather than performance.

It Changes Emotional Regulation

Perhaps the most important misconception about anxiety is the belief that emotions originate from a single chemical imbalance or one isolated region of the brain.

The reality is considerably more sophisticated.

Emotional regulation emerges from the continuous interaction of multiple neural networks responsible for evaluating internal physiology, interpreting external circumstances, recalling past experience, anticipating future possibilities, regulating stress responses, and selecting appropriate behavioral responses.

Inflammation influences every level of that process.

It alters communication among the prefrontal cortex, limbic structures, autonomic pathways, and stress-regulating systems such as the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Serotonin, GABA, glutamate, dopamine, and many other neurotransmitter systems participate in these adaptive changes, not as isolated switches evoking various emotions, but as components of an integrated biological response.

This is why inflammation rarely changes only one aspect of human experience.

Anxiety may become more prominent, but it often appears alongside fatigue, altered sleep, diminished motivation, changes in appetite, increased pain sensitivity, cognitive slowing, and a pervasive sense that something simply does not feel right.

From the perspective of modern neuroscience, these are not separate biological events. They are different expressions of one integrated adaptive response

It Changes Metabolic Strategy

The brain cannot reprioritize physiology without also changing metabolism.

Protective responses require energy, and energy must come from somewhere. As inflammation activates the immune system and the brain begins implementing new priorities, hormones such as cortisol and catecholamines help redirect metabolic resources. The liver increases glucose production through gluconeogenesis. Insulin secretion rises. Peripheral tissues may temporarily become less responsive to insulin, allowing more glucose to remain available for organs and cells that require it during the acute response.

These changes are not necessarily signs of disease.

In many situations, they represent normal adaptive physiology.

The challenge is that adaptive responses occur in bodies that do not all begin from the same metabolic starting point.

Someone with excellent metabolic flexibility may move through these temporary adjustments efficiently and return to baseline once the threat has resolved. Someone already living with hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, mitochondrial dysfunction, or impaired metabolic flexibility experiences a much greater physiological burden. The same protective mechanisms are activated, but they unfold within a system that has less reserve and a reduced capacity to restore equilibrium.

This may help explain why similar inflammatory challenges produce dramatically different experiences in different people. The biology of adaptation is shared. The capacity to navigate that adaptation is not.

The cost of adaptation is determined not only by the challenge itself, but also by the metabolic flexibility with which the body meets it.

The biology the brain interprets helps shape the function that ultimately emerges. Understanding that relationship has profound implications for how we think about recovery, resilience, and lasting change.

Why Doesn’t Everyone With Inflammation Develop Anxiety?

If inflammation can influence anxiety, an obvious question follows.

Why doesn’t everyone with inflammation become anxious?

The answer reminds us that biology is rarely determined by a single variable.

The inflammatory response itself matters, but so do the biological conditions in which that response occurs. The intensity of the inflammation, how long it persists, the tissues involved, a person’s age, genetics, sleep, hormonal status, metabolic health, previous illnesses, medications, nutritional status, and countless other factors all influence how the brain interprets and responds to changing biological conditions.

Just as importantly, people differ enormously in their capacity to adapt.

Some individuals move through significant biological challenges and recover efficiently. Others experience prolonged symptoms long after the original illness has resolved. The difference is not simply the severity of the challenge. It also reflects the resilience, flexibility, and reserve of the biological systems responding to that challenge.

Metabolism plays a central role in that process.

Protective responses require energy. The immune system requires energy. Tissue repair requires energy. The brain itself requires enormous amounts of energy to continually integrate information, reprioritize physiology, and coordinate adaptation throughout the body.

How efficiently those demands are met depends in part upon metabolic flexibility—the ability to shift between available energy sources, respond appropriately to changing physiological demands, and restore metabolic balance once the challenge has passed.

Someone with excellent metabolic flexibility may tolerate an inflammatory challenge with relatively little disruption, returning to baseline as protective responses resolve. Someone already living with hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, mitochondrial dysfunction, or reduced metabolic reserve may experience a far greater physiological burden from the very same challenge. The adaptive response itself is similar. The biological capacity to support that response is not.

This may help explain why similar infections, injuries, periods of stress, or inflammatory illnesses produce remarkably different experiences in different people.

The biology of adaptation is shared.

The capacity to navigate that adaptation is not.

The cost of adaptation is determined not only by the challenge itself, but also by the metabolic flexibility with which the body meets it.

Can Reducing Inflammation Improve Anxiety?

If inflammation can contribute to anxiety, it is reasonable to ask whether reducing inflammation can improve it.

For some people, the answer appears to be yes.

An expanding body of research suggests that reducing inflammatory activity can improve anxiety symptoms in certain individuals, particularly when inflammation is persistent and accompanied by other features of metabolic dysfunction or chronic illness. At the same time, many people with anxiety have little evidence that inflammation is playing a dominant role, while others have anxiety that reflects multiple interacting biological, psychological, and social factors.

This is one reason simplistic explanations are rarely helpful.

Inflammation is neither the cause of all anxiety nor an incidental finding that can always be ignored.

It is one of many biological signals the brain continuously integrates as it determines how the body should respond to its internal and external environment.

The practical implication is that successful treatment begins with understanding the individual sitting in front of you rather than assuming every person with anxiety shares the same biology.

For some, addressing sleep, nutrition, metabolic health, autoimmune disease, hormonal dysfunction, chronic infection, or other sources of persistent inflammation may substantially reduce the biological signals contributing to heightened vigilance. For others, psychotherapy, medications, trauma-informed care, lifestyle interventions, or social support may deserve greater emphasis.

These approaches should not be viewed as competing explanations.

They are often addressing different aspects of the same integrated biological system.

The goal is not only to reduce inflammation but to understand why the brain continues receiving biological information that supports protective priorities in the first place.

What Should You Do If You Think Inflammation Is Contributing to Your Anxiety?

If anxiety has developed alongside changes in your physical health, it is reasonable to consider whether inflammation or another biological process may be contributing.

That does not mean inflammation is necessarily the primary cause.

Nor does it mean that every laboratory abnormality requires treatment or that recovery depends upon finding one hidden diagnosis.

It means that anxiety deserves to be understood within the broader context of the organism’s biology rather than being viewed exclusively as a disorder of thoughts, emotions, neurotransmitters, or brain chemistry.

The first question is not simply whether inflammation is present. The first question is: What biological state is this organism operating within?

That question changes the entire evaluation.

Every adaptive response occurs within an existing biological landscape. Two people may experience the same infection, surgery, injury, psychological stress, or major life event. One recovers quickly and returns to baseline. Another develops persistent anxiety, fatigue, disrupted sleep, brain fog, chronic pain, insulin resistance, weight gain, depression, or a broader sense that something has fundamentally changed.

The triggering event may be identical.

But the biological state in which each person entered that challenge is not.

Metabolic flexibility, insulin sensitivity, mitochondrial function, sleep quality, hormonal physiology, nutritional status, body composition, physical conditioning, chronic stress, previous illness, medication exposure, age, genetics, and countless other factors all influence how efficiently the organism adapts—and how effectively it recovers once the original challenge has passed.

This is why a comprehensive evaluation is so important.

Rather than asking only, What diagnosis does this person have? or Which laboratory values are abnormal?, a systems biology approach asks broader questions.

What biological conditions existed before the anxiety developed?

What changed?

Which adaptive responses followed?

What is maintaining those adaptations?

And what biological conditions are preventing normal resolution and recovery?

These questions often provide far greater insight than searching for one abnormal laboratory value, one inflammatory marker, one hormone, one neurotransmitter, or one nutrient deficiency that explains everything.

This perspective also differs from approaches that focus primarily on correcting individual pathways with increasingly complex supplement regimens. Nutrients, supplements, medications, hormones, and targeted therapies may all have an appropriate role when guided by sound clinical reasoning. However, biology rarely changes because one pathway is supported in isolation. Human physiology functions as an integrated system, and lasting recovery often depends upon restoring coordination among multiple biological systems rather than optimizing each independently.

The same principle applies to treatment.

Psychotherapy, appropriate medications, nutritional intervention, exercise, sleep restoration, stress reduction, mindfulness practices, healthy relationships, metabolic therapies, treatment of underlying medical conditions, acupuncture, massage therapy, physical rehabilitation, and other evidence-informed approaches may all contribute to recovery. These interventions should not be viewed as competing philosophies. Each influences the organism through different biological pathways, and each may be valuable when it addresses an important contributor to the person’s current biological state.

For that reason, individuals concerned that inflammation or metabolic dysfunction may be contributing to anxiety should seek a comprehensive evaluation from a physician experienced in systems biology and metabolic brain and body medicine. The goal is not to order every available laboratory test or recommend the largest number of supplements. It is to understand the integrated biological state of the organism, identify the factors that are maintaining protective adaptations, and develop a thoughtful, individualized plan to restore health.

Lasting health is restored not by forcing the brain to function differently, but by restoring the biological conditions from which healthier brain function naturally emerges. In that setting, recovery becomes an expression of restored biology rather than simply better symptom management.

What We Commonly See at Touchpoints180®

One of the most striking observations in clinical practice is that anxiety rarely arrives alone.

People often come to us believing they have developed a growing list of unrelated problems. Anxiety may have been followed by fatigue, disrupted sleep, brain fog, declining concentration, weight gain, chronic pain, digestive symptoms, hormonal changes, autoimmune disease, recurrent infections, or increasing difficulty recovering from everyday stress. Some have accumulated multiple diagnoses over many years. Others have been told that each symptom represents a separate condition requiring its own treatment.

Yet when these experiences are viewed through the lens of systems biology, a different pattern often emerges.

Rather than representing isolated diseases, many of these changes appear to reflect a common biological story unfolding across multiple organ systems. The immune system, endocrine system, nervous system, metabolism, and brain are not failing independently. They are responding together to the same changing biological environment.

This perspective also helps explain why treating one symptom in isolation sometimes provides only partial or temporary improvement. While symptom-directed treatments remain valuable and often necessary, lasting recovery frequently requires understanding the broader biological state that gave rise to those symptoms in the first place.

One of the most rewarding moments in clinical practice occurs when people realize that what once felt like a collection of unrelated problems may instead represent a coherent biological pattern. When seemingly unrelated symptoms are recognized as parts of the same biological story, recovery becomes less about chasing individual symptoms and more about restoring the conditions from which health can emerge.

What This Does Not Mean

Understanding the relationship between inflammation and anxiety does not mean that inflammation explains every experience of anxiety or that every person with anxiety has an underlying inflammatory disorder.

Anxiety is one of the most complex experiences in human biology. It emerges through the continuous interaction of the brain with genetics, development, life experiences, relationships, personality, trauma, physical health, metabolism, hormones, immune function, the environment, and countless other biological and psychological influences. No single framework can fully explain every individual’s experience.

Likewise, the presence of inflammation does not necessarily mean that it is contributing to anxiety. Many people experience inflammatory illnesses without significant anxiety, while others develop anxiety in the absence of measurable systemic inflammation. Human biology is rarely governed by a single variable.

This article also does not suggest that inflammation, insulin resistance, metabolic dysfunction, or any other biological process should replace psychological, psychiatric, or social explanations for anxiety. These perspectives are not competing theories. They are complementary ways of understanding different aspects of the same person.

The purpose of systems biology is therefore not to replace one reductionistic explanation with another. It is to recognize that the brain continuously integrates biological information from throughout the organism and that inflammation represents one important source of that information.

Understanding that broader biological context does not diminish the importance of psychology, relationships, or lived experience. It enriches our understanding of all of them.

When Further Evaluation May Be Appropriate

Not every experience that people describe as “anxiety” reflects the same underlying biology.

The word anxiety is often used to describe a wide range of experiences, including fear, worry, panic, inner tension, restlessness, agitation, racing thoughts, hypervigilance, emotional distress, or simply the feeling that something is wrong. Although these experiences may feel similar, they do not necessarily arise from the same biological or clinical state.

For example, what one person experiences as generalized anxiety may, in another, represent psychomotor agitation, a mixed depressive state, medication-induced akathisia, autonomic dysregulation, thyroid disease, hormonal change, inflammation, or another medical or neurological condition. The symptoms may overlap, but the underlying biology—and therefore the most appropriate treatment—may be very different.

A more comprehensive medical evaluation may therefore be appropriate when anxiety is new, changes significantly from its previous pattern, becomes progressively more difficult to treat, or develops alongside other unexplained physical or cognitive symptoms. Persistent fatigue, brain fog, declining concentration or memory, disrupted sleep, chronic pain, digestive symptoms, unexplained weight change, insulin resistance, autoimmune disease, recurrent infections, hormonal changes, or neurological symptoms may all suggest that broader biological processes deserve consideration.

Individuals whose anxiety has responded only partially to otherwise appropriate treatment may also benefit from a more comprehensive evaluation, particularly when symptoms appear disproportionate to psychological circumstances or occur alongside progressive changes in physical health.

The purpose of that evaluation is not just to make a diagnosis or order an ever-expanding list of laboratory tests. It is to better understand the biological context within which anxiety has emerged, determine whether broader adaptive processes are contributing to its persistence, and identify opportunities to restore the conditions that support healthier brain and body function.

How This Fits Within Metabolic Brain and Body Health

One of the central ideas of metabolic brain and body health is that the brain cannot be fully understood in isolation from the body that supports it.

Every thought, emotion, memory, behavior, and decision emerges from a brain that is continuously integrating information from throughout the organism. Immune activity, metabolism, hormones, sleep, nutrition, physical activity, stress, the gut microbiome, cardiovascular health, social connection, and countless other biological processes all contribute to the biological environment within which the brain functions.

Inflammation is one important part of that ongoing biological conversation.

Understanding inflammation therefore teaches something much larger than why some people experience anxiety. It illustrates a broader principle of human biology: changes occurring anywhere in the organism can influence how the brain functions because the brain is continuously adapting to the biological information it receives.

This integrated perspective often reveals connections that are otherwise easy to miss. Symptoms that appear unrelated may instead reflect coordinated adaptations occurring across multiple systems. Anxiety, fatigue, brain fog, disrupted sleep, metabolic dysfunction, chronic pain, and changes in mood may represent different expressions of the same underlying biological state rather than separate problems requiring independent explanations.

This does not mean every symptom has a single cause or that every condition can be reduced to metabolism or inflammation. Human biology is far more complex than that.

It does mean that understanding the integrated biological state of the organism often provides a clearer framework for understanding why symptoms develop, why they persist, and what conditions are most likely to support recovery.

Ultimately, metabolic brain and body health is not simply another way of treating disease.

It is a different way of understanding health.

Rather than asking the brain to function differently despite the body’s biology, metabolic brain and body health seeks to restore the biological conditions from which healthier brain function can naturally emerge.

Closing Thoughts

Anxiety has traditionally been understood by asking what a person is thinking, fearing, remembering, anticipating, or experiencing.

Those questions remain important. But this article suggests that another question sometimes deserves equal attention: Under what biological conditions is my brain interpreting the world?

That question does not replace psychology with biology, nor does it reduce human experience to laboratory values or inflammatory markers. Rather, it recognizes that every thought, emotion, memory, and behavior emerges from a brain that is continuously adapting to the biological environment in which it is operating.

Sometimes anxiety reflects external circumstances that genuinely require our attention.

Sometimes it reflects patterns of thinking that have become entrenched over time.

Sometimes it accompanies trauma, grief, loss, or profound uncertainty.

And sometimes the biology supporting the brain has changed in ways that deserve to be recognized as well.

Recognizing those possibilities does not make anxiety less real.
It makes it more understandable.

Perhaps the most important lesson is that the brain is continuously integrating information from every major physiological system while determining how best to allocate attention, energy, motivation, emotion, and behavior.

When those biological conditions change, our experience of the world may change with them.

Recovery, then, is often about more than reducing symptoms.

It is about restoring the biological conditions from which healthier brain function can naturally emerge.

And perhaps that is the most hopeful message of all.

The goal is not simply to change the mind. It is to help restore the biology from which the mind emerges.

Related Questions

1. What Is Inflammation?
2. Can Inflammation Cause Depression?
3. Can Inflammation Cause Brain Fog?
4. Can Anxiety Cause Inflammation?
5. Can Chronic Stress Cause Inflammation?
6. What Is Metabolic Brain and Body Health?
7. Can Insulin Resistance Contribute to Anxiety?
8. How Does Sleep Affect Anxiety?
9. Can Inflammation Cause Brain Atrophy?

References

1. Medzhitov R. Origin and physiological roles of inflammation. Nature. 2008;454(7203):428-435. doi:10.1038/nature07201. PMID:18650913.
2. Dantzer R, O’Connor JC, Freund GG, Johnson RW, Kelley KW. From inflammation to sickness and depression: when the immune system subjugates the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(1):46-56. doi: 10.1038/nrn2297. PMID: 18073775.
3. Konsman JP, Parnet P, Dantzer R. Cytokine-induced sickness behaviour: mechanisms and implications. Trends Neurosci. 2002;25(3):154-159. doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(00)02088-9. PMID:11852148.
4. Irwin MR, Cole SW. Reciprocal regulation of the neural and innate immune systems. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11(9):625-632. doi:10.1038/nri3042. PMID:21818124.
5. Craig AD. How do you feel—now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(1):59-70. doi:10.1038/nrn2555. PMID: 19096369.
6. Michopoulos V, Powers A, Gillespie CF, Ressler KJ, Jovanovic T. Inflammation in fear- and anxiety-based disorders: PTSD, GAD, and beyond. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017;42(1):254-270. doi:10.1038/npp.2016.146. PMID:27510423.
7. Costello H, Gould RL, Abrol E, Howard R. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between peripheral inflammatory cytokines and generalised anxiety disorder. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027925. PMID:31326932.
8. Renna ME, O’Toole MS, Spaeth PE, Lekander M, Mennin DS. The association between anxiety, traumatic stress, and obsessive-compulsive disorders and chronic inflammation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Depress Anxiety. 2018;35(11):1081-1094. doi:10.1002/da.22790. PMID:30199144.
9. Won E, Kim YK. Neuroinflammation-associated alterations of the brain as potential neural biomarkers in anxiety disorders. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(18):6546. doi:10.3390/ijms21186546. PMID:32906843.
10. Miller AH, Haroon E, Raison CL, Felger JC. Cytokine targets in the brain: impact on neurotransmitters and neurocircuits. Depress Anxiety. 2013;30(4):297-306. doi:10.1002/da.22084. PMID:23468190.
11. Miller AH, Raison CL. The role of inflammation in depression: from evolutionary imperative to modern treatment target. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016 ;16(1):22-34. doi: 10.1038/nri.2015.5. PMID: 26711676.
12. McEwen BS. Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: central role of the brain. Physiol Rev. 2007;87(3):873-904. doi:10.1152/physrev.00041.2006. PMID:17615391.
13. Slavich GM, Irwin MR. From stress to inflammation and major depressive disorder: a social signal transduction theory of depression. Psychol Bull. 2014;140(3):774-815. doi:10.1037/a0035302. PMID:24417575.
14. O’Neill LAJ, Kishton RJ, Rathmell J. A guide to immunometabolism for immunologists. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(9):553-565. doi:10.1038/nri.2016.70. PMID:27396447.
15. Hotamisligil GS. Inflammation and metabolic disorders. Nature. 2006;444(7121):860-867. doi:10.1038/nature05485. PMID:17167474.
16. Fullerton JN, Gilroy DW. Resolution of inflammation: a new therapeutic frontier. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15(8):551-567. doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.39. PMID:27020098.
17. Furman D, Campisi J, Verdin E, Carrera-Bastos P, Targ S, Franceschi C, et al. Chronic inflammation in the etiology of disease across the life span. Nat Med. 2019;25(12):1822-1832. doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0675-0. PMID:31806905.