Touchpoints180® Expert Answer

Why Do I Have Brain Fog If My Labs Are Normal?

Last Updated: June 2026

Author:  Lori Calabrese, MD

Quick Answer

Brain fog is often treated as a symptom in search of a single cause. In practice, it rarely is.

It’s not a diagnosis. It’s a description of an experience.

It is one of the most common concerns brought to Touchpoints180® by people who know something has changed, even when testing appears reassuring.

Many people experiencing brain fog have normal laboratory testing, normal imaging, and no obvious neurological disease. Yet they know something has changed. Concentration requires more effort. Mental stamina is less reliable. Recovery takes longer. Cognitive clarity no longer feels automatic.

In many cases, brain fog is not the result of one broken system. It may emerge when several systems that support cognitive performance—including sleep, metabolism, hormonal regulation, vascular health, stress physiology, inflammation, cognitive reserve, and neuroplasticity—are no longer functioning together as effectively as they once did.

People often ask what is causing their brain fog. But the question I frequently find more useful is:

What is brain fog revealing about the biological conditions in which the brain is being asked to function?

That changes how we think about symptoms, evaluation, and the future trajectory of brain health.

Key Takeaways

• Brain fog is not a diagnosis. It is a description of an experience. People use the term to describe changes in concentration, memory, mental stamina, processing speed, or cognitive efficiency, but those experiences can arise from many different biological processes.
• People experience function. Medicine often measures disease. This helps explain why someone can feel cognitively different despite normal testing. Traditional evaluation is designed to identify disease. It is often less effective at capturing the cumulative effects of multiple small changes occurring across several interconnected systems.
• Brain fog is often less a disorder of intelligence than a disorder of cognitive efficiency. Many highly capable individuals continue to perform at a high level despite brain fog. What changes is not necessarily what they know, but how much effort is required to access and use that knowledge.
• The issue may not be that nobody looked—it may be that nobody knew where to look. Sleep, metabolism, hormones, vascular health, inflammation, stress physiology, and cognitive reserve can all influence cognition, even when conventional testing appears reassuring.
• Cognitive reserve is what resilience looks like in the brain. It reflects the brain’s ability to maintain function despite aging, stress, illness, or other biological challenges and helps explain why people with similar risk factors can experience very different cognitive trajectories.
• Neuroplasticity is the mechanism through which today’s biological environment becomes tomorrow’s brain. The brain continuously adapts to the conditions in which it operates. Sleep, metabolism, physical activity, stress, inflammation, and other biological influences help shape that process over time.
• The future brain is not created all at once. It is built one adaptation at a time. Cognitive health is not determined by a single decision, diagnosis, or laboratory result. It emerges from the cumulative effects of biological conditions acting over years and decades.
• Curiosity is not the same thing as alarm. Paying attention to changes in cognitive function does not require assuming the worst. Meaningful patterns often emerge through careful observation of context, trajectory, and pace of change.
• The brain does not exist above the biology of the body. It exists within it. Cognitive function emerges from the interaction between the brain and the biological systems that support it, including sleep, metabolism, vascular health, hormonal regulation, immune signaling, and stress physiology.
• People often ask what is causing their brain fog. A more useful question may be: What is brain fog revealing? In many cases, the symptom itself is less informative than what it reveals about the biological conditions influencing cognitive performance, resilience, and long-term brain health.

The Deeper Question Most People Never Ask

One of the reasons brain fog can be so frustrating is that it behaves less like a disease and more like a warning light.

A warning light tells us that something deserves attention. It does not tell us which system is responsible.

The same challenge exists with brain fog.

Difficulty concentrating, mental fatigue, slower thinking, forgetfulness, reduced cognitive endurance, and word-finding difficulties can emerge from remarkably different biological processes. Sleep apnea, insulin resistance, menopause, chronic inflammation, depression, autoimmune disease, long COVID, vascular dysfunction, and neurodegenerative disease may all produce symptoms that sound surprisingly similar.

This creates a problem for both patients and clinicians.

People naturally search for a single explanation. Yet the same symptom may emerge when very different biological systems begin to function less efficiently.

A woman entering menopause may describe brain fog.

A person with untreated sleep apnea may describe brain fog.

Someone with insulin resistance may describe brain fog.

An individual recovering from COVID may describe brain fog.

The symptoms may sound nearly identical.

The biology may be entirely different.

This raises an important question.

Perhaps the most useful question is not:

“What is causing my brain fog?”

Perhaps the more useful question is:

“What systems allow the brain to function with clarity, focus, efficiency, and resilience—and how might those systems be functioning?”

That shift in perspective changes everything.

Instead of searching for a single cause, we begin examining the biological systems that make cognitive performance possible in the first place.

In many cases, brain fog is not the problem itself.

It is the visible manifestation of changes occurring within the systems that support cognitive function.

What Is Brain Fog, Really?

One reason brain fog is so difficult to understand is that it is not a medical diagnosis. It is a term people use to describe a change in how their brain is functioning.

Most people know exactly what they mean when they say they have brain fog. They describe difficulty concentrating, forgetting information they would normally remember, losing track of conversations, struggling to find words, feeling mentally fatigued, or requiring more effort to complete tasks that once felt automatic.

Yet those experiences do not all reflect the same cognitive process.

Cognitive function is not a single ability. It is the product of multiple systems working together simultaneously.

Attention allows us to focus on relevant information and filter distractions.

Working memory allows us to temporarily hold and manipulate information while solving problems, making decisions, or carrying on conversations.

Processing speed determines how efficiently information is analyzed and integrated.

Executive function helps us organize, plan, prioritize, shift attention, and manage complex tasks.

Memory systems allow us to encode, store, and retrieve information when it is needed.

Cognitive endurance allows those functions to remain effective throughout the day.

When people describe brain fog, they are often describing a decline in one or more of these capacities.

Importantly, this does not necessarily mean that intelligence has changed.

Many highly accomplished people experiencing brain fog continue to perform at a high level. They may still lead organizations, practice medicine, manage businesses, teach, write, care for families, or make complex decisions.

What has changed is not necessarily what they know.

What has changed is how efficiently the brain is performing the work.

This distinction is important.

Brain fog is often less a disorder of intelligence than a disorder of cognitive efficiency.

The brain may still be capable of performing the task. It simply requires more effort, more time, more energy, or greater concentration to achieve the same result.

That observation provides an important clue.

If cognitive efficiency has changed, it becomes reasonable to ask what biological systems support cognitive efficiency in the first place.

The answer leads us beyond the symptom itself and into the mechanisms that make clear thinking possible.

The Systems That Support Cognitive Clarity

Most discussions of brain fog focus on symptoms.

People describe forgetfulness, difficulty concentrating, mental fatigue, slower thinking, word-finding problems, or the feeling that their brain is simply not working the way it once did.

Those experiences are important.

But symptoms tell us what is happening.

They do not necessarily tell us why.

To understand brain fog, it helps to look beyond the symptom itself and consider the biological systems that make cognitive performance possible.

The brain does not function in isolation. Clear thinking depends upon a continuous supply of energy, restorative sleep, healthy insulin signaling, balanced immune activity, hormonal regulation, adequate blood flow, nutritional sufficiency, and the brain’s ability to adapt to changing demands throughout life.

When these systems are functioning well, cognition often feels effortless.

When one or more of them becomes strained, cognitive efficiency may decline. The result can be difficulty concentrating, mental fatigue, slower processing, forgetfulness, reduced cognitive endurance, or the experience many people describe as brain fog.

Importantly, different biological disruptions may produce remarkably similar symptoms.

A person with insulin resistance may experience brain fog.

A person with sleep apnea may experience brain fog.

A woman navigating menopause may experience brain fog.

Someone recovering from a viral illness may experience brain fog.

The symptoms may sound similar.

The underlying biology may not be.

Understanding the systems that support cognitive clarity provides a more useful framework than searching for a single explanation. It helps explain why brain fog can emerge in so many different situations—and why the path toward improvement often begins with understanding which systems may be under strain.

1. Brain Energy Production

The human brain represents only about two percent of total body weight, yet it consumes roughly twenty percent of the body’s energy at rest.

That energy demand is extraordinary.

Every thought, memory, conversation, decision, emotional response, and cognitive task requires energy. Neurons must continuously maintain electrical gradients, transmit signals across synapses, recycle neurotransmitters, repair cellular structures, and adapt to changing demands throughout the day. Even when we are sitting quietly, the brain remains one of the most metabolically active organs in the body.

For that reason, cognitive function is fundamentally an energy-dependent process.

The brain does not run on willpower.

It runs on energy.

When the systems responsible for producing, delivering, or utilizing energy become less efficient, the effects often appear first in the activities that require the greatest metabolic investment. Sustained concentration becomes more difficult. Mental endurance declines. Processing speed slows. Complex tasks require greater effort. Information may feel harder to retrieve. Many people describe these experiences as brain fog.

Importantly, this does not necessarily mean that brain cells are dying or that dementia is developing.

In many cases, the issue is efficiency rather than capacity.

The brain may still be capable of performing the task, but it requires more effort, more time, or greater cognitive resources to achieve the same result. A person who once moved effortlessly through a demanding workday may find that the same responsibilities now feel mentally exhausting. The work still gets done, but it no longer feels easy.

This distinction helps explain why highly accomplished individuals are often among the first to notice subtle changes. Executives, physicians, attorneys, entrepreneurs, educators, and other high performers spend much of their lives operating near the upper limits of cognitive performance. Small declines in efficiency may be apparent to them long before they become visible on formal testing.

Modern neuroscience increasingly recognizes that disturbances in brain energy metabolism may contribute to cognitive symptoms across a wide range of conditions, including insulin resistance, sleep disorders, depression, chronic inflammation, neurodegenerative disease, and the biological changes associated with aging.

This does not mean that all brain fog is an energy problem.

It does suggest that energy metabolism occupies a central place in the biology of cognitive function.

When the brain’s energy demands are no longer being met as efficiently as before, cognition often changes long before a diagnosis appears.

2. Insulin Signaling and Metabolic Health

When most people think about insulin, they think about diabetes.

The brain, however, cares about insulin for reasons that extend far beyond blood sugar.

Insulin functions as a signaling molecule throughout the central nervous system. It influences energy utilization, synaptic activity, neurotransmitter regulation, neuroplasticity, vascular function, and cellular maintenance. In other words, insulin participates in many of the processes that allow the brain to function efficiently.

This creates an important distinction.

A person can have normal blood glucose and still experience changes in insulin signaling.

In the early stages of insulin resistance, the body often compensates by producing larger amounts of insulin to maintain normal glucose levels. Routine laboratory testing may therefore appear reassuring while the metabolic environment is already changing.

From the perspective of cognition, this matters.

The brain requires a continuous and highly regulated supply of energy. When insulin signaling becomes less efficient, the consequences may extend beyond metabolism. Researchers are increasingly investigating links between insulin resistance and attention, executive function, memory, mood regulation, cognitive aging, and neurodegenerative disease.

Some investigators have even described Alzheimer’s disease as involving elements of “brain insulin resistance,” reflecting growing recognition that metabolic processes and cognitive processes are deeply interconnected.

This does not mean that insulin resistance causes every case of brain fog.

Nor does it mean that every person with brain fog has a metabolic problem.

What it does suggest is that cognition and metabolism cannot be viewed as completely separate systems.

The same biological processes that influence metabolic health may also influence how efficiently the brain produces, utilizes, and manages energy.

This is one reason cognitive symptoms sometimes emerge years before diabetes is diagnosed.

A person may notice declining mental clarity, reduced cognitive endurance, increasing difficulty concentrating, or changes in memory while conventional measures of glucose remain within the normal range. The metabolic changes occurring beneath the surface may be far more important than a single laboratory value.

From a Metabolic Brain and Body Health perspective, this relationship is difficult to ignore.

The brain is not isolated from metabolism.

It is one of the organs most dependent upon it.

3. Sleep Architecture and Recovery

Many people with brain fog insist they are sleeping enough.

That observation is often important.

Because sleep duration and sleep quality are not the same thing.

The brain does not simply need time asleep. It depends upon a highly organized sequence of biological processes that occur throughout the night. Deep sleep, REM sleep, circadian rhythms, oxygenation, memory consolidation, hormonal regulation, and metabolic recovery all contribute to cognitive function the following day.

When these processes become disrupted, the consequences may appear first as cognitive symptoms.

A person may sleep for eight hours and still wake feeling mentally exhausted.

They may struggle with concentration despite spending adequate time in bed. They may describe difficulty finding words, slower thinking, reduced mental stamina, impaired memory, or the persistent feeling that their brain is operating below its usual capacity.

The issue is often not the number of hours slept.

The issue is what happened during those hours.

One reason sleep is so closely tied to cognition is that some of the brain’s most important maintenance activities occur while we sleep. Memories are consolidated. Synaptic connections are strengthened, modified, or pruned. Metabolic waste products are cleared. Hormonal signaling changes. Energy reserves are replenished. Information gathered during the day is processed and integrated.

In many ways, sleep represents the brain’s most important period of recovery.

When recovery becomes impaired, performance often follows.

This relationship helps explain why so many different conditions associated with poor sleep can produce remarkably similar cognitive symptoms. Sleep apnea, insomnia, chronic stress, circadian disruption, menopause, depression, anxiety disorders, chronic pain, inflammatory conditions, and certain medications may all interfere with sleep architecture in ways that affect cognition the following day.

The symptoms may appear cognitive.

The underlying disruption may begin during sleep.

For this reason, sleep is often one of the first places I look when someone reports brain fog, declining concentration, memory concerns, reduced cognitive endurance, or the sense that they are no longer functioning at their usual level.

Not because sleep explains every case.

But because the brain rarely performs at its best when it has not fully recovered.

4. Inflammation and Immune Signaling

Most people think of inflammation as something that happens in a swollen joint, an injured muscle, or an infected tissue.

The brain sees inflammation differently.

The immune system and nervous system are in constant communication. Signals produced by the immune system influence how the brain allocates energy, regulates attention, processes information, manages motivation, and responds to the environment.

Most people have experienced this relationship firsthand.

Consider what happens during a significant viral illness.

Even before symptoms fully develop, many people notice mental fatigue, reduced concentration, slower thinking, decreased motivation, social withdrawal, and an overwhelming desire to rest. These changes are not accidental. They reflect biological signals sent from the immune system to the brain.

From an evolutionary perspective, this response makes sense. When the body is fighting infection, conserving energy and redirecting resources toward recovery may be advantageous.

The problem arises when inflammatory signaling becomes persistent.

In that setting, the same biological pathways that help coordinate recovery during acute illness may begin to influence cognition on a more chronic basis. Concentration may become more difficult. Mental stamina may decline. Processing speed may slow. Motivation may diminish. The result may be experienced as brain fog, even when conventional neurological testing appears reassuring.

This framework helps explain why cognitive symptoms are so common across conditions that initially appear unrelated. Obesity, insulin resistance, autoimmune disease, chronic infections, sleep disorders, depression, and Long COVID all involve varying degrees of immune activation and inflammatory signaling. The diagnoses differ. The pathways influencing the brain often overlap.

Importantly, inflammation is not simply a problem of the body.

It is also a problem of communication.

The brain continuously interprets signals from the immune system and adjusts its activity accordingly. When those signals change, cognition, mood, energy, and behavior may change as well.

This does not mean that inflammation explains every case of brain fog.

It does suggest that understanding immune signaling is often an important part of understanding why the brain may not be functioning at its usual level.

5. Hormonal Regulation

When people think about hormones, they often think about reproduction.

The brain, however, is one of the body’s most hormone-responsive organs.

Hormones influence far more than fertility. They participate in energy metabolism, sleep regulation, neuroplasticity, vascular function, immune signaling, stress physiology, and neurotransmitter activity. In many ways, hormones help coordinate the biological environment in which cognitive function occurs.

This helps explain why hormonal transitions are frequently accompanied by changes in cognition.

Many women entering perimenopause or menopause describe word-finding difficulties, reduced concentration, mental fatigue, changes in memory, diminished cognitive endurance, or the unsettling feeling that their thinking is no longer as sharp as it once was. These experiences are often dismissed as stress, aging, or simple distraction.

The biology is considerably more interesting.

Estrogen influences multiple brain regions involved in memory, attention, executive function, and emotional regulation. It also participates in cerebral glucose metabolism, helping the brain efficiently utilize energy. As estrogen signaling changes during the menopause transition, the effects may extend well beyond reproductive health.

Sleep often changes.

Energy regulation may change.

Inflammatory signaling may change.

Vascular function may change.

The brain itself is adapting to a new biological environment.

This broader perspective helps explain why cognitive symptoms during menopause can feel so significant. The experience is rarely confined to a single pathway. Multiple systems that support cognitive clarity may be changing simultaneously.

Hormonal influences on cognition are not limited to menopause. Thyroid dysfunction, testosterone deficiency, elevated cortisol, and other hormonal disturbances may also affect attention, memory, motivation, processing speed, and mental stamina.

The common theme is not the specific hormone.

The common theme is that cognition does not occur independently of the biological environment that supports it.

When that environment changes, cognitive function may change as well.

Understanding those relationships often provides a more useful framework than viewing hormones as isolated laboratory values or reproductive signals. Hormones are part of the broader network of biological processes that help determine how the brain thinks, learns, adapts, and performs throughout life.

6. Stress Physiology and Autonomic Regulation

Many people think of stress primarily as an emotional experience.

From the brain’s perspective, stress is also a biological state.

When a threat is perceived—whether physical, psychological, inflammatory, metabolic, financial, relational, or occupational—the body initiates a coordinated response designed to improve survival. Hormones are released, attention narrows, vigilance increases, energy is redirected, and physiological priorities begin to shift.

In the short term, these adaptations can be remarkably effective.

The challenge arises when the stress response remains activated for prolonged periods.

The brain regions most responsible for planning, decision-making, working memory, emotional regulation, attention, and cognitive flexibility are particularly sensitive to chronic stress physiology. Rather than operating from a state optimized for reflection, learning, and complex problem solving, the brain may begin functioning from a state designed primarily for adaptation and survival.

As this occurs, people often notice changes in cognitive performance.

Concentration becomes more difficult to sustain. Mental fatigue develops more quickly. Information may feel harder to organize and retrieve. Decision-making requires greater effort. Multitasking becomes less efficient. Tasks that once felt manageable may begin to feel cognitively overwhelming.

The experience can be confusing because intelligence has not necessarily changed.

Knowledge has not disappeared.

Capacity has not been lost.

What has changed is the biological environment supporting cognitive performance.

Sleep may become fragmented. Inflammatory signaling may increase. Insulin sensitivity may change. Recovery becomes less efficient. Attention is repeatedly redirected toward perceived threats rather than long-term goals. Over time, the cumulative effect of these changes may be experienced as brain fog.

This relationship helps explain why cognitive symptoms are so common during periods of chronic caregiving, professional burnout, prolonged illness, major life transitions, financial uncertainty, or sustained psychological stress. The symptoms are often interpreted as a problem of memory or concentration when, in reality, they may reflect a brain attempting to adapt to persistent physiological demand.

From a cognitive perspective, stress is not merely something we feel.

It is something the brain must continuously manage.

When the demands placed upon those adaptive systems exceed their capacity for recovery, cognitive efficiency often declines long before formal testing identifies a disorder.

7. Vascular Health and Cerebral Blood Flow

The brain is often described as an electrical organ.

It is equally accurate to describe it as a vascular organ.

Every thought, memory, conversation, and cognitive task depends upon a continuous supply of oxygen and nutrients delivered through an extraordinarily complex network of blood vessels. Although the brain represents only a small percentage of total body weight, it receives a disproportionate share of the body’s blood flow because its metabolic demands are so high.

Cognitive function is therefore not determined solely by neurons.

It also depends upon the health of the vascular system supporting them.

This relationship is easy to overlook because vascular problems are often associated with dramatic events such as heart attacks and strokes. Long before those conditions develop, however, subtle changes in vascular function may already be influencing how the brain performs.

The inner lining of blood vessels, known as the endothelium, plays a central role in regulating blood flow throughout the body. Healthy endothelial function allows blood vessels to respond dynamically to changing demands. Areas of the brain engaged in complex cognitive tasks can receive increased blood flow precisely when additional energy and oxygen are required.

When vascular function becomes less efficient, the effects may be subtle at first.

Mental stamina may decline.

Complex cognitive tasks may feel more effortful.

Processing speed may slow.

Recovery after periods of intense mental work may become less complete.

These changes rarely announce themselves as vascular problems. More often, they are experienced as reduced cognitive efficiency.

Many of the conditions associated with brain fog also influence vascular health. Insulin resistance, hypertension, chronic inflammation, poor sleep, obesity, sedentary behavior, smoking, and aging can all affect the vascular system long before overt cardiovascular disease becomes apparent.

This overlap is one reason cognitive symptoms and cardiovascular risk factors frequently travel together.

The brain depends upon healthy blood flow every moment of every day. When vascular function changes, cognition may change with it.

From this perspective, protecting cognitive health is not merely a neurological goal.

It is also a cardiovascular one.

The health of the blood vessels supplying the brain may be just as important as the health of the brain tissue itself.

8. Nutrient Sufficiency and Biochemical Capacity

The brain is often described as an electrical organ, a metabolic organ, or a cognitive organ.

It is also a biochemical organ.

Every day, billions of neurons must manufacture neurotransmitters, maintain cellular membranes, repair damaged structures, generate energy, regulate oxidative stress, support myelin integrity, and adapt to new experiences through neuroplasticity. These processes require an enormous number of biochemical reactions occurring continuously throughout life.

Those reactions depend upon raw materials.

Nutrients are not simply substances that prevent deficiency diseases. They provide the building blocks required for normal cellular function throughout the nervous system. When those building blocks become inadequate, the effects may appear first in highly demanding tissues such as the brain.

This relationship helps explain why cognitive symptoms sometimes emerge before a deficiency becomes severe enough to trigger obvious medical findings.

Iron contributes to oxygen transport and energy production.

Vitamin B12 and folate participate in neurological function, DNA synthesis, and methylation pathways.

Omega-3 fatty acids help support neuronal membranes and cellular signaling.

Magnesium plays a role in hundreds of enzymatic reactions, including many involved in nervous system function.

Vitamin D influences immune regulation, neurobiology, and numerous processes extending well beyond bone health.

The specific nutrient is often less important than the broader principle.

Cognitive performance depends upon adequate biochemical capacity.

When the brain lacks the substrates required to efficiently perform its work, concentration, mental stamina, memory, processing speed, and overall cognitive efficiency may be affected.

This does not mean that every case of brain fog reflects a nutritional problem. Nor does it suggest that cognitive symptoms can be solved simply by taking supplements.

The relationship is far more nuanced.

What it does illustrate is that cognition depends upon a complex biological infrastructure. Nutritional status is one component of that infrastructure, helping create the conditions under which the brain can function, adapt, and recover.

The question is not merely whether a laboratory value falls within a reference range.

The deeper question is whether the biological systems supporting cognitive function have the resources they need to perform efficiently over time.

9. Environmental Exposures and Biological Context

The brain does not function in isolation.

Every day it responds to signals arising not only from the body, but also from the environment in which that body exists.

Air quality, environmental toxins, infectious exposures, medications, alcohol, substance use, occupational exposures, and other environmental influences may all interact with the biological systems that support cognitive function. In many cases, these effects occur indirectly rather than through direct injury to the brain itself.

This distinction is important.

Environmental exposures are often discussed as though they produce symptoms in a simple cause-and-effect manner. Human biology is rarely that straightforward.

More often, exposures influence the systems we have already discussed. They may alter inflammatory signaling, affect mitochondrial function, disrupt sleep, influence autonomic regulation, impair vascular health, increase oxidative stress, or place additional demands upon the body’s adaptive capacity. The cognitive symptoms that follow are often the downstream consequences of those biological changes.

This framework helps explain why responses to environmental exposures vary so widely from one person to another.

Two individuals may encounter the same exposure and have very different experiences. One may remain unaffected. Another may develop fatigue, cognitive symptoms, sleep disruption, mood changes, or reduced resilience. The difference often lies not only in the exposure itself, but also in the biological context into which that exposure is introduced.

This perspective is particularly relevant when evaluating complex symptoms such as brain fog. The goal is not to assume that every environmental exposure is clinically significant. Nor is it to dismiss environmental factors altogether.

The more useful question is often:

How might a particular exposure be influencing the biological systems that support cognitive function?

That question shifts attention away from speculation and toward mechanism.

From a clinical perspective, understanding how the brain interacts with its environment is often more informative than focusing on any single exposure in isolation. The brain’s response to an environmental challenge may ultimately matter more than the challenge itself.

10. Neuroplasticity, Cognitive Reserve, and the Brain’s Capacity to Adapt

One of the most significant advances in modern neuroscience has been the recognition that the adult brain remains capable of change throughout life. For much of the twentieth century, the prevailing view was that the brain largely completed its development early in life and then entered a gradual process of aging and decline. Research over the past several decades has revealed a far more dynamic reality.

The brain is continuously adapting.

This capacity for adaptation is known as neuroplasticity. Neuroplasticity refers to the brain’s ability to modify existing neural networks, strengthen or weaken connections, form new pathways, and reorganize its structure and function in response to experience and biological conditions. Learning, memory formation, recovery from injury, emotional adaptation, skill acquisition, and cognitive resilience all depend upon neuroplastic processes occurring throughout life.

The importance of neuroplasticity extends well beyond learning new information. It helps explain why cognitive function is not fixed. The brain is constantly responding to the conditions in which it exists, adjusting its networks to meet changing demands and challenges. In this sense, neuroplasticity serves as the biological mechanism through which experience becomes biology.

Those experiences include more than education, intellectual stimulation, or life events. They also include the internal biological environment. Sleep quality, energy metabolism, insulin signaling, inflammatory activity, hormonal regulation, vascular health, nutritional status, physical activity, and stress physiology all influence the conditions under which the brain must adapt. Over years and decades, the cumulative effects of these influences help shape the efficiency, flexibility, and resilience of neural networks.

This perspective provides an important framework for understanding cognitive reserve.

Cognitive reserve refers to the brain’s ability to maintain function despite aging, disease, injury, or other physiological challenges. Individuals with greater reserve often remain cognitively capable despite biological changes that might produce noticeable symptoms in others. Their brains appear better able to compensate, recruit alternative pathways, and maintain performance when confronted with stressors.

The development of cognitive reserve is not a single event, nor is it determined entirely by genetics. It’s not just something you’re born with, it’s something that’s built. It emerges gradually through the interaction between neuroplasticity and the biological environment in which neuroplasticity occurs. In many respects, cognitive reserve can be viewed as the accumulated result of years of adaptation.

Cognitive reserve is what resilience looks like in the brain.

This helps explain why two people of similar age may experience very different cognitive trajectories. One remains mentally sharp, resilient, and independent well into later life, while another begins experiencing cognitive symptoms much earlier. Although diagnoses and risk factors matter, they do not tell the entire story. The brain’s capacity to adapt also matters.

Viewed through this lens, brain fog becomes more than an isolated symptom. It may represent an early indication that the biological conditions supporting cognitive performance and cognitive resilience deserve closer attention. The same factors influencing concentration, mental stamina, processing speed, and memory today may also influence how the brain adapts over the years ahead.

For this reason, I often think about cognitive health less as a diagnosis and more as a trajectory. The most useful question is not simply whether the brain is functioning normally at a particular moment in time. A more informative question is whether the conditions supporting neuroplasticity, cognitive reserve, and resilience are moving in the right direction.

The future brain is not created all at once. It is built one adaptation at a time.

The brain is not a static organ awaiting decline. It is an adaptive organ that continuously responds to the environment created around it and within it. Understanding that principle may be one of the most important steps toward understanding not only brain fog, but long-term cognitive health itself.

Neuroplasticity is the mechanism through which today’s biological environment becomes tomorrow’s brain.

Why Standard Testing May Appear Normal

One of the most confusing aspects of brain fog is that many people do exactly what they are supposed to do and still leave without an explanation that feels satisfying.

They schedule appointments. They undergo testing. They seek specialist opinions. They review laboratory results and are told that everything looks reassuring. Yet the original concern remains unresolved.

Their thinking feels different.

Their concentration is not what it once was.

Mental stamina has declined.

Something has changed, but no single test appears to explain it.

Part of the confusion arises from an assumption that is rarely stated explicitly: if testing is normal, all of the systems supporting cognitive function must also be functioning optimally.

Human biology does not always work that way.

Many of the systems discussed throughout this article exist along a spectrum of performance. Sleep architecture can become less restorative without meeting criteria for a sleep disorder. Insulin signaling can become less efficient years before diabetes develops. Hormonal transitions can influence cognition despite laboratory values that remain within reference ranges. Inflammatory burden, vascular function, stress physiology, physical conditioning, and cognitive reserve can all change gradually over time.

Viewed individually, none of these changes may be dramatic enough to trigger a diagnosis.

Viewed collectively, they may be highly relevant.

Brain fog is often not the result of a single broken system.

It may emerge when several systems that support cognitive clarity are each operating somewhat below their previous capacity.

This helps explain why people can experience noticeable changes in cognitive function despite reassuring evaluations. Traditional medical testing is extraordinarily effective at identifying disease. It is generally less effective at capturing the cumulative impact of multiple small changes occurring across several interconnected systems.

People experience function.

Medicine often measures disease.

Both perspectives are important, but they answer different questions.

A diagnosis asks whether a recognizable disease process is present. Cognitive function reflects the combined performance of the biological systems that support attention, memory, mental stamina, processing speed, resilience, and recovery.

The distinction matters because many people are not seeking answers to a diagnostic question.

They are seeking answers to a functional one.

They want to understand why thinking feels harder than it once did, why concentration requires more effort, why recovery is slower, or why they no longer feel cognitively at their best.

“Reassuring” testing does not necessarily mean the investigation is complete. When cognitive function changes, understanding why often requires a physician who recognizes how sleep, metabolism, hormonal regulation, inflammation, vascular health, stress physiology, and cognitive reserve interact to influence cognitive performance.

The issue may not be that nobody looked—it may be that nobody knew where to look.

Many people assume that brain fog must reflect a single underlying cause waiting to be discovered. In practice, that is often not what we see. Brain fog is frequently not the result of one broken system. More often, it emerges when several systems that support cognitive clarity are no longer working together as efficiently as they once did.

Sleep may be less restorative than it was five years ago. Recovery from stress may take longer. Metabolic flexibility may have changed. Hormonal transitions may be altering the brain’s operating environment. Physical activity may have declined. Cognitive reserve may no longer provide the same margin for error it once did.

Individually, none of these changes may be dramatic. Most would not be considered a disease. Yet the brain experiences their cumulative effect.

People experience function. Medicine often measures disease.

Understanding that distinction helps explain why someone can feel cognitively different despite reassuring evaluations. The question is not always whether a diagnosis explains the symptoms. Sometimes the more useful question is what has changed in the systems that support cognitive clarity and why they are no longer functioning at the level they once were.

What We Commonly See at Touchpoints180®

Many of the people who seek our help for brain fog do not arrive because they have been diagnosed with a neurological disease.

They arrive because they recognize a change.

Their thinking feels different than it did a few years ago. Concentration requires more effort. Mental stamina is less reliable. Recovery after cognitively demanding days takes longer. Word retrieval may not feel as automatic. The changes are often subtle, but they are real enough that people begin asking questions.

What is striking is how often these individuals remain highly functional.

Many continue to succeed professionally. They lead organizations, manage families, run businesses, care for others, solve complex problems, and meet the demands of daily life. From the outside, they often appear to be doing well.

What concerns them is not the loss of intelligence.

It is the loss of ease.

Tasks that once felt natural require greater effort. The margin between being cognitively sharp and cognitively depleted becomes smaller. Resilience is no longer taken for granted.

By the time many people arrive at Touchpoints180®, they have already invested significant time trying to understand what is happening. They have read books, listened to podcasts, followed experts, tried supplements, modified their diets, undergone testing, and collected more information than they know what to do with.

The problem is rarely a lack of information.

More often, it is a lack of a framework that makes sense of the information they already have.

This is where many people become stuck. One source emphasizes hormones. Another focuses on inflammation. A third points to insulin resistance. Others emphasize sleep, toxins, stress, nutrient deficiencies, vascular health, genetics, or aging. Each explanation may contain part of the story, yet none fully explains the experience.

What we commonly see is that people are often searching for answers to the wrong question.

They are looking for a diagnosis that explains everything.

What they are actually experiencing may be the cumulative effect of multiple systems that support cognitive clarity no longer functioning together as effectively as they once did.

Most people who come to Touchpoints180® are not seeking answers to a diagnostic question.

They are seeking answers to a trajectory question, whether they realize it or not.

Beneath concerns about brain fog, memory, concentration, or mental stamina is often a deeper question:

“What is happening to my brain, and where is this heading?”

They want to understand why something has changed, what factors may be contributing to that change, and whether there is an opportunity to influence where that trajectory leads. Their concern is often not limited to how they feel today. They are trying to understand what today’s symptoms may mean for the future of their brain, their independence, their performance, and their quality of life.

That distinction changes the conversation.

Instead of asking only whether disease is present, we begin asking what conditions are being created for the brain’s future. Instead of focusing exclusively on diagnosis, we examine the systems that support cognitive clarity, resilience, adaptation, and long-term brain health.

For many people, that is the first framework that makes sense of what they have been experiencing.

What This Does Not Mean

After reading about sleep, metabolism, inflammation, hormones, vascular health, stress physiology, cognitive reserve, and neuroplasticity, some readers may wonder whether every episode of brain fog should be viewed as evidence that something is wrong.

That would be the wrong conclusion.

Human beings are not designed to function with perfect consistency. Mental clarity fluctuates. Attention varies. Sleep is sometimes restorative and sometimes not. Stress accumulates, life circumstances change, and cognitive performance naturally rises and falls over time. Experiencing occasional brain fog does not automatically indicate disease, dysfunction, or future decline.

At the same time, the absence of disease does not make symptoms meaningless.

One of the limitations of modern healthcare is the tendency to reduce complex experiences into a binary question: either a diagnosis is present or nothing is wrong. Most of human biology exists between those two extremes. A person may understand why cognitive function has changed without receiving a new diagnosis. Poor sleep, chronic stress, hormonal transitions, physical inactivity, inflammatory burden, metabolic changes, and diminished resilience can all influence how the brain performs without necessarily constituting a disease.

This distinction is one reason I place so much emphasis on understanding rather than diagnosis alone. Diagnoses matter. They can be life-changing and, at times, life-saving. Yet a diagnosis and an explanation are not always the same thing. Many people receive reassuring evaluations while continuing to wonder why they no longer feel cognitively like themselves. Others receive a diagnosis but never gain a meaningful understanding of the biological factors that contributed to it.

The purpose of exploring the systems that support cognitive clarity is not to encourage endless testing or to search for hidden problems around every corner. More information does not always create more clarity. In some cases, further investigation is appropriate. In others, the most important insights come from recognizing patterns that are already visible and understanding how they influence the brain over time.

The issue is not whether something is wrong.

The issue is whether we understand what is happening.

Curiosity is not the same thing as alarm. One expands understanding. The other narrows it. The goal is not to prove the presence or absence of disease, but to develop a clearer understanding of the biological conditions in which the brain is operating so that we can actively influence  cognitive function, resilience, and long-term trajectory.

When Further Evaluation May Be Appropriate

Most episodes of brain fog do not indicate a progressive neurological disease.

That distinction is important because many people understandably worry about dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, or another serious neurological condition when they notice changes in memory, concentration, or cognitive performance.

In practice, the symptom itself is often less informative than the pattern in which it occurs.

The direction and speed of change frequently matter more than the symptom alone.

A person who notices subtle changes in concentration during a period of poor sleep, chronic stress, hormonal transition, illness, or metabolic dysfunction presents a very different picture than someone experiencing steadily worsening cognitive symptoms despite otherwise stable circumstances. Similarly, cognitive changes that remain relatively stable over time are often viewed differently than symptoms that appear to be progressing.

The impact on daily function also matters.

Many people experiencing brain fog continue to perform at a high level professionally and personally, even if doing so requires greater effort than before. Others begin noticing increasing difficulty managing tasks that were previously routine, keeping track of important information, navigating familiar responsibilities, or maintaining their usual level of independence.

Context matters as well.

Sudden cognitive changes, symptoms accompanied by neurological findings, significant changes in behavior or personality, concerns raised by family members, or evidence of progressive decline deserve careful medical evaluation. These situations raise different questions than the gradual fluctuations in cognitive efficiency discussed throughout much of this article.

One reason I emphasize trajectory so heavily is that cognitive health is rarely captured by a single moment in time. A laboratory result, imaging study, or office visit provides a snapshot. Understanding cognitive change often requires looking at the broader pattern that emerges across months or years.

A forgotten name, a misplaced item, or a mentally exhausting week rarely tells us very much in isolation. What matters is the larger pattern. Are the symptoms stable or progressing? Are they occurring in the context of poor sleep, chronic stress, illness, hormonal transition, or other identifiable changes? Are they interfering with daily function in new ways? Has anyone else noticed a difference?

These are the questions that help determine whether a symptom represents a temporary fluctuation in cognitive performance or something that deserves closer evaluation.

Curiosity is not the same thing as alarm. Paying attention to changes in cognitive function does not require assuming the worst. In many cases, understanding the context, trajectory, and pace of change provides far more useful information than the symptom itself.

The challenge is knowing what to pay attention to, when, and for how long in order to decide what deserves investigation and what deserves action.

How This Fits Within Metabolic Brain and Body Health

Many people think about brain health as something that happens inside the brain.

That assumption seems reasonable until you begin asking a different question:

What allows the brain to function well in the first place?

The answer extends far beyond neurons and neurotransmitters.

The brain depends upon a continuous supply of energy, restorative sleep, healthy blood flow, appropriate hormonal signaling, efficient stress regulation, physical activity, and a biological environment capable of supporting resilience and adaptation. When those conditions change, cognitive function often changes with them. The symptoms may appear in the brain, but many of the factors influencing those symptoms originate far beyond it.

The brain does not exist above the biology of the body. It exists within it.

Over time, this observation became impossible for me to ignore. People would arrive seeking answers for memory concerns, cognitive decline, difficulty concentrating, anxiety, depression, mental fatigue, or brain fog. Yet the factors most relevant to their symptoms frequently involved sleep, metabolism, hormones, physical health, vascular function, inflammation, stress physiology, or other biological systems traditionally viewed as separate from the brain.

The separation never made sense to me.

Cognitive function is not created by the brain alone. It emerges from the interaction between the brain and the biological systems that support it.

That observation ultimately became the foundation for what I call Metabolic Brain and Body Health.

The phrase reflects a simple idea, and one that has become foundational to how I think about brain health. The future of the brain is shaped, in part, by the biological conditions in which it is asked to function every day. Some of those conditions support resilience, adaptation, and cognitive reserve. Others gradually challenge them. Most do not operate in isolation.

People often ask whether a particular symptom, laboratory result, diagnosis, or risk factor is responsible for how they feel. Sometimes the answer is yes. More often, what matters is the cumulative effect of multiple influences acting together over time.

This is one reason I spend so much time thinking about trajectory.

The question is rarely limited to how the brain is functioning today.

The more important questions may be where the brain is heading. What trajectory is being created by today’s biology?

That question shifts the conversation. Sleep quality, metabolic health, vascular function, hormonal regulation, physical activity, stress resilience, cognitive engagement, and inflammatory burden become more than isolated variables. They become part of the environment in which the brain is continuously adapting.

Neuroplasticity is the mechanism through which today’s biological environment becomes tomorrow’s brain.

The future brain is not created all at once. It is built one adaptation at a time.

Viewed through that lens, brain fog becomes more than a symptom. It becomes a signal worth paying attention to. Not because it suggests or even predicts a particular diagnosis, but because it offers insight into the biological conditions shaping cognitive function today and cognitive resilience in the years ahead.

This broader perspective is the foundation of Metabolic Brain and Body Health—the idea that the future of the brain is influenced by the biological conditions in which it is asked to function every day.

Closing Thoughts

Brain fog is often dismissed because it can be difficult to measure, difficult to diagnose, and difficult to explain.

Yet some of the most important changes in health begin long before they become obvious enough to meet the criteria for a diagnosis.

That is one reason I have never been particularly interested in reducing brain fog to a single symptom, laboratory value, diagnosis, or treatment strategy.

The more interesting question is why the brain is struggling in the first place.

Over the course of this article, we have explored sleep, metabolism, hormones, inflammation, vascular health, stress physiology, cognitive reserve, and neuroplasticity. These are often discussed as separate topics. In reality, they are part of the biological environment in which the brain must function every day.

When that environment changes, cognitive function often changes with it.

For some people, brain fog is temporary.

For others, it becomes one of the earliest indications that the systems supporting cognitive clarity, resilience, and long-term brain health deserve closer attention.

People often ask what is causing their brain fog.

The question I find myself asking is different.

What is brain fog revealing?

The answer is not always simple.

It may involve sleep. It may involve metabolism. It may involve hormones, inflammation, vascular function, stress physiology, or factors that have not yet been fully recognized. Sometimes the most important finding is not a diagnosis at all. Sometimes it is the recognition that the biological conditions supporting the brain are no longer as robust as they once were.

The future of the brain is influenced by those conditions.

For that reason, brain fog is rarely a symptom I dismiss.

Not because it predicts a particular disease.

But because it often points toward questions worth asking while there is still time to influence the trajectory of the brain itself.

---

Related Questions

• Why Am I Tired Even When I Sleep Enough?
• Why Do I Feel Mentally Exhausted All the Time?
• Why Can’t I Concentrate Like I Used To?
• Why Am I Forgetting Words?
• Why Is My Memory Getting Worse?
• Can Insulin Resistance Cause Brain Fog?
• Can Menopause Cause Brain Fog?
• Can Hormones Affect Memory and Concentration?
• Can Sleep Apnea Cause Brain Fog?
• Can Poor Sleep Affect Memory?
• Can Stress Cause Brain Fog?
• Can Chronic Stress Affect Cognitive Function?
• Can Inflammation Cause Brain Fog?
• Why Does Inflammation Affect the Brain?
• Can Long COVID Cause Brain Fog?
• What Is the Difference Between Brain Fog and Cognitive Decline?
• Is Brain Fog a Sign of Dementia?
• What Are the Early Signs of Cognitive Decline?
• Can Cognitive Decline Be Prevented?
• How Do I Protect My Brain As I Get Older?
• What Is Cognitive Reserve?
• What Is Neuroplasticity?
• How Does Metabolism Affect Brain Function?
• Can Metabolic Health Affect Memory?
• What Is Metabolic Brain and Body Health?
• What Is Metabolic Psychiatry?
• Can Symptoms Appear Before a Diagnosis Is Made?
• Why Do I Feel Different Even Though My Tests Are Normal?
• Why Do I Have Symptoms When My Doctor Says Everything Is Normal?
• What Should Be Evaluated When Brain Fog Does Not Go Away?

---

About Lori Calabrese, MD

Lori Calabrese, MD, is a physician leader in metabolic psychiatry, metabolic health, and brain health. She trained at Johns Hopkins and Harvard and served on the faculties of both Harvard Medical School and Yale School of Medicine. She is the founder of Touchpoints180®, a physician-led educational and health transformation ecosystem focused on metabolic brain and body health. Dr. Calabrese is a Nutrition Network Certified Medical Practitioner (summa cum laude), SMHP Certified Practitioner, ReCODE 2.0 Certified Practitioner, physician-educator, speaker, and advocate dedicated to advancing the understanding of how metabolism influences mental, cognitive, and physical well-being.

---

About Touchpoints180®

Touchpoints180® is a physician-led educational and health transformation ecosystem built around the principles of Metabolic Brain and Body Health.

By integrating education, mentorship, and systems-based health optimization, it helps individuals understand how the biological systems shaping resilience, cognition, mood, metabolism, and long-term well-being interact. That understanding helps people identify what truly moves the needle, make more informed decisions about their health, and take meaningful action that can change the trajectory of their lives.

---

Educational Disclaimer

This content is provided for educational purposes only and is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. It should not be considered medical advice and does not replace individualized medical evaluation, diagnosis, or treatment. Decisions regarding medical care should be made in consultation with a qualified healthcare professional familiar with your specific circumstances.

The references below are provided for readers who wish to explore the scientific literature supporting the concepts discussed in this Expert Answer.

Medically Reviewed by Lori Calabrese, MD

Last reviewed: June 2026

References

1. Cunnane SC, Trushina E, Morland C, Prigione A, Casadesus G, Andrews ZB, et al. Brain energy rescue: an emerging therapeutic concept for neurodegenerative disorders of ageing. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;19(9):609-633. doi: 10.1038/s41573-020-0072-x. Epub 2020 Jul 24. PMID: 32709961.
2. Swerdlow RH. Brain aging, Alzheimer’s disease, and mitochondria. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011 Dec;1812(12):1630-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.08.012. PMID: 21920438.

3. Arnold SE, Arvanitakis Z, Macauley-Rambach SL, Koenig AM, Wang HY, Ahima R et al. Brain insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer disease: concepts and conundrums. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14(3):168-181. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.185. PMID: 29377010.
4. de la Monte SM. Insulin resistance and Alzheimer’s disease. BMB Rep. 2009;42(8):475-81. doi: 10.5483/bmbrep.2009.42.8.475. PMID: 19712582.

5. Walker MP. The role of sleep in cognition and emotion. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1156:168-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04416.x. PMID: 19338508.
6. Xie L, Kang H, Xu Q, Chen MJ, Liao Y, Thiyagarajan M. et al. Sleep drives metabolite clearance from the adult brain. Science. 2013;342(6156):373-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1241224. PMID: 24136970.

7. Dantzer R, O’Connor JC, Freund GG, Johnson RW, Kelley KW. From inflammation to sickness and depression: when the immune system subjugates the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(1):46-56. doi: 10.1038/nrn2297. PMID: 18073775.
8. Miller AH, Raison CL. The role of inflammation in depression: from evolutionary imperative to modern treatment target. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016 ;16(1):22-34. doi: 10.1038/nri.2015.5. PMID: 26711676.

9. Maki PM, Kornstein SG, Joffe H, Bromberger JT, Freeman EW, Athappilly G, et al. Board of Trustees for The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) and the Women and Mood Disorders Task Force of the National Network of Depression Centers. Guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of perimenopausal depression: summary and recommendations. Menopause. 2018 Oct;25(10):1069-1085. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001174. PMID: 30179986.
10. Mosconi L, Rahman A, Diaz I, Wu X, Scheyer O, Hristov HW, et al. Increased Alzheimer’s risk during the menopause transition: a 3-year longitudinal brain imaging study. PLoS One. 2018;13(12):e0207885.
11. McEwen BS, Morrison JH. The brain on stress: vulnerability and plasticity of the prefrontal cortex over the life course. Neuron. 2013 ;79(1):16-29. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.028. PMID: 23849196.

12. Iadecola C. The pathobiology of vascular dementia. Neuron. 2013;80(4):844-66. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.008. PMID: 24267647.
13. Gorelick PB, Scuteri A, Black SE, Decarli C, Greenberg SM, Iadecola C, et al. American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia. Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2011;42(9):2672-713. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182299496. PMID: 21778438.

14. Stern Y. Cognitive reserve in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(11):1006-1012. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70191-6. PMID: 23079557
15. Park DC, Bischof GN. The aging mind: neuroplasticity in response to cognitive training. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2013;15(1):109-19. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2013.15.1/dpark. PMID: 23576894.
16. Kolb B, Gibb R. Brain plasticity and behaviour in the developing brain. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011;20(4):265-76. PMID: 22114608.

17. Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, Ames D, Ballard C, Banerjee S,et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020;396(10248):413-446. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6. Erratum in: Lancet. 2023 Sep 30;402(10408):1132. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02043-3. PMID: 32738937.
18. Ngandu T, Lehtisalo J, Solomon A, Levälahti E, Ahtiluoto S, Antikainen R et al. A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Jun 6;385(9984):2255-63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60461-5. Epub 2015 Mar 12. PMID: 25771249.